Products News
Home > About Us>Blog>Products News>NEMA vs. Zhaga: LED Lighting Control

NEMA vs. Zhaga: LED Lighting Control

Aug. 21, 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

NEMA and Zhaga are two standard organizations in the lighting industry, each providing a set of specifications to assist manufacturers in designing, producing, and deploying lighting products. The choice of which standard is suitable for your lighting project depends on several factors, including project requirements, regulatory requirements in your region, as well as your preferences and budget.


What is NEMA?

NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) is a trade association in the United States dedicated to establishing standards for electrical equipment and systems. In the lighting industry, NEMA has developed a series of standards covering specifications for luminaires, control systems, power equipment, and more. These standards are typically comprehensive and applicable to large-scale lighting projects, especially in the North American region. Among them, ANSI C136.41 is a NEMA standard relevant to smart lighting projects, defining sockets and controllers for connecting and controlling LED lighting. NEMA lighting standards ensure a high level of compatibility and interchangeability between different products, enabling manufacturers and end-users to more easily select and install lighting products that meet their needs.

What is Zhaga?

Zhaga is a global lighting industry standard organization dedicated to defining standards for LED lighting components such as LED modules and drivers. Their standards ensure interchangeability and flexibility of LED products, allowing LED modules from different manufacturers to be used in various luminaires. Zhaga standards provide greater flexibility and customization for LED lighting design, helping to meet the evolving market demands.


Differences between NEMA and Zhaga

NEMA vs. Zhaga: LED Lighting Control


NEMA vs. Zhaga: LED Lighting Control

When comparing NEMA and Zhaga standards, we can contrast them in several aspects including electrical architecture, electrical contacts, dimming support, auxiliary power, interoperability, cost and availability, performance requirements, and innovation.


Electrical Architecture

NEMA: With NEMA architecture, AC power is first connected to the socket and then supplied to the luminaire and its driver. Controllers are directly connected to the main power, providing interfaces for connection and dimming control.

Zhaga: AC power is first connected to the luminaire, while the socket connects to the low-voltage auxiliary power provided by the driver. Zhaga luminaires' drivers have more functions, such as enhanced surge protection and electrical energy metering.


Electrical Contacts

NEMA: Uses varying numbers of contacts for functional control, including high-voltage lines, which are relatively complex in design.

Zhaga: Utilizes a unified 4-pin contact for functional control, excluding high-voltage lines, resulting in a simpler design.


Dimming Support

NEMA: Supports analog (0-10V/1-10V) or DALI communication, but analog dimming is less accurate, while DALI communication requires additional wiring or components.

Zhaga: Default supports DALI communication, which is more accurate and reliable, without the need for additional wiring or components.


Auxiliary Power

NEMA: Provides auxiliary power through the driver, but this feature is not widely supported.

Zhaga: Provides auxiliary power through the driver, widely supported, ensuring power efficiency and stability.

Interoperability:

NEMA: Defines specific product types and performance requirements, reducing flexibility and interoperability between products.

Zhaga: Defines standardized interfaces for LED lighting components, providing greater flexibility and interchangeability for products.


Cost and Availability

NEMA: Due to more components, the cost is higher, and additional components increase system costs.

Zhaga: Controller costs are lower, but luminaire costs may be higher due to the enhanced functionality of the driver.

Performance Requirements:

NEMA: Focuses on specific product types and performance indicators such as luminous output and lifespan.

Zhaga: Focuses on more flexible and adaptable performance requirements, such as mechanical dimensions and electrical characteristics.


Innovation

NEMA: Lower innovation potential, based on traditional standards, with limited functionality or services.

Zhaga: Promotes technological innovation and market competition, driving the development of smart lighting technology through standardized interfaces and collaboration with other organizations.


Which is better for your project: NEMA or Zhaga?

NEMA is the standard interface in North America, suitable for single luminaire controllers, and technologically, RF Mesh is widely used in North and South America. In contrast, Zhaga, proposed by European companies, adopts LoRa communication technology and may become the lighting control standard in Europe in the future.

 

Based on the following assumptions, the current trend indicates that Zhaga is more likely to prevail:

 

Unified standard

Powerful functionality

Recommendation from lighting industry giants

 

Considering factors such as project scale, geographical location, requirements, and budget, you can choose the standard that best suits your project:

 

Geographical location and market demand: NEMA may be preferred for the North American market, while Zhaga may be considered for the European or global market.

 

Flexibility and interchangeability requirements: Projects requiring greater flexibility and interchangeability may choose Zhaga, as it emphasizes standardized component interfaces.

 

Dimming support and performance requirements: Projects requiring precise and reliable dimming support may consider Zhaga, as it inherently supports DALI communication.

 

Cost and availability: Consider budget and availability; NEMA controllers are more readily available in North America, while Zhaga controllers may be more cost-effective in certain regions

 

Product lifespan and innovation requirements: Projects with high demands for product lifespan and future innovation may be more suitable for Zhaga, as it offers longer lifespan and greater innovation potential.

Summary

In summary, this article has introduced NEMA and Zhaga, as well as their roles in establishing standards and driving industry innovation. Whether NEMA or Zhaga, they both provide interfaces for outdoor lighting intelligent control, serving smart control purposes. Depending on project requirements and priorities, you can choose the standard that best fits your project. If you are interested in NEMA or Zhaga interfaces, feel free to contact Kinlights to communicate with lighting experts and obtain more comprehensive advice and guidance.


Previous

Watt vs Lumen

Next

Lux VS Lumens

Kinlights is an Outdoor Lighting Manufacturer, Factory, Supplier and Exporter, factory in China, ISO9001, ISO14001, ISO45001 and ISO50001 certified since 2015.

Contact Us

inquiry@kinlights.com

+86 150 147 57085

3rd Floor, Building B1, Xinjianxing Technology Industrial Park, Fengxin Rd, Loucun Commnunity, Xinhu Subdistrict, Guangming District, Shenzhen

Copyright © Shenzhen Kinlights Technology Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved